Purity is something beautiful because it is good for the race. Liberals are obsessed with racial purity – they are always reacting to it. They claim to be appalled, whilst they deny their own desires for purity. Liberals themselves desire purity in morality and essentially claim that whoever desires racial purity is morally impure – stained even.
Trying to make that which is beautiful look ugly is proposing an upside-down worldview which is what liberalism has been about since the beginning. Liberalism is the total inversion of normal healthy human racial values in an effort to create a new post-racial man. What is healthy is then suddenly sick, what is normal is then suddenly abnormal, and what is human is then suddenly inhuman.
Liberalism is merely a reaction to race, a reaction to racial purity. It condemns whatever is good for the race, while preaching whatever is bad for the race. Liberalism is an anti-evolutionary state religion of modern Western countries. It is certainly inspired by Judeo-Christianity with all its appeals to altruism and morality.
Racial purity is what is best for the race, and that is why liberalism advocates race-mixing. Many people take their upside-down liberal valuez with them even if they ‘convert’ to nationalism. That is why it is vital to talk about racial purity as a fundamental value for the race. There can be no racial continuity without the practice of racial purity.
Racial purity is the basis for racial survival – it cannot be ignored. Liberalism is literally the path to racial death. Liberalism can be analysed as a (state) religion which is radically against racial survival. Liberalism embraces whatever will cause racial death. It is a religion of irreversable death instead of inventive survival.
Someone who wishes to survive ought to be flexible and practical and open-minded. However, liberals possess not of those survivor’s virtues. Liberals are radicals who only oppose racial purity. They try to offer all sorts of critiques of racial purity. They do this by responding or reacting to racial purity, and these responses or reactions are usual emotional.
They may, for instace, claim to be appalled by racial purity. However, this can be solved by offering another perspective. We should not forget there is another story. The point is to ask for empathy by telling our side of the story: The story of racial purity. Our story is about the people’s need for survival. This need should not be ignored or neglected – it should be empathised with.